On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Ed Eliot <email address hidden> wrote:
> Hi TweeZz,
>
> I'm afraid we haven't got to it yet. I'll let you know as soon as it's
> fixed.
>
> Ed
>
> TweeZz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is this issue already fixed / implemented?
> >
> >
>
> --
> images with same name, but different extension
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194689
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in CSS Sprite Generator: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> In my application I have an image called "ciselniky.gif" and also one
> that's called "ciselniky.png".
> I agree that probably it doesn't make a lot of sense to have it like that,
> but anyway it causes problems.
>
> The generated css looks like:
> .img_modules_ciselniky { background-position: 0 -30px; }
> .img_modules_ciselniky { background-position: 0 -498px; }
>
> The last one is the one used.
> Maybe there could be an optional setting to include the extension in the
> generated css?
>
Ok.. thx for the info..
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Ed Eliot <email address hidden> wrote:
> Hi TweeZz, /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 194689 ciselniky { background- position: 0 -30px; } ciselniky { background- position: 0 -498px; }
>
> I'm afraid we haven't got to it yet. I'll let you know as soon as it's
> fixed.
>
> Ed
>
> TweeZz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is this issue already fixed / implemented?
> >
> >
>
> --
> images with same name, but different extension
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in CSS Sprite Generator: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> In my application I have an image called "ciselniky.gif" and also one
> that's called "ciselniky.png".
> I agree that probably it doesn't make a lot of sense to have it like that,
> but anyway it causes problems.
>
> The generated css looks like:
> .img_modules_
> .img_modules_
>
> The last one is the one used.
> Maybe there could be an optional setting to include the extension in the
> generated css?
>