images with same name, but different extension

[TweeZz]

In my application I have an image called "ciselniky.gif" and also one that's called "ciselniky.png".
I agree that probably it doesn't make a lot of sense to have it like that, but anyway it causes problems.

The generated css looks like:
.img_modules_ciselniky { background-position: 0 -30px; }
.img_modules_ciselniky { background-position: 0 -498px; }

The last one is the one used.
Maybe there could be an optional setting to include the extension in the generated css?

[Stuart Colville (muffinresearch)]

This is confirmed. Looks like there's a need to prevent duplicate classnames and to append a number of some other unique identifier to the end of the classname when a dupe exists.

[TweeZz (manu-temmermanuyttenbroeck)]

Hi,

Is this issue already fixed / implemented?

[Ed Eliot (ejeliot)]

Hi TweeZz,

I'm afraid we haven't got to it yet. I'll let you know as soon as it's
fixed.

Ed

TweeZz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is this issue already fixed / implemented?
>
>

[TweeZz (manu-temmermanuyttenbroeck)]

Ok.. thx for the info..

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Ed Eliot <email address hidden> wrote:

> Hi TweeZz,
>
> I'm afraid we haven't got to it yet. I'll let you know as soon as it's
> fixed.
>
> Ed
>
> TweeZz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is this issue already fixed / implemented?
> >
> >
>
> --
> images with same name, but different extension
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194689
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in CSS Sprite Generator: Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> In my application I have an image called "ciselniky.gif" and also one
> that's called "ciselniky.png".
> I agree that probably it doesn't make a lot of sense to have it like that,
> but anyway it causes problems.
>
> The generated css looks like:
> .img_modules_ciselniky { background-position: 0 -30px; }
> .img_modules_ciselniky { background-position: 0 -498px; }
>
> The last one is the one used.
> Maybe there could be an optional setting to include the extension in the
> generated css?
>