Comment 1 for bug 809484
Revision history for this message
| John A Meinel (jameinel) wrote Re: Bzr up is redundant | #1 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
f33e652
(Get the code!)
I'm not sure about the 'bzr revno --tree' bug, but I think you are confused. revert is *not* the same as update, because revert *intentionally* doesn't change the working tree revision pointer. Specifically so that if you are at rev 10, and want to undo the previous commit, you can "bzr revert -r -9; bzr commit" to create revision 11 like things were at rev 9.