Comment 2 for bug 491223
Revision history for this message
| Alexander Belchenko (bialix) wrote Re: [Bug 491223] Re: bzr revert needs --no-recurse option | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
Dmitrijs Ledkovs пишет:
> If you want to revert the directory name change but not the files change
> in it you would do $ bzr mv again. If you have changed files in the top
> level dir you can just list them $ bzr revert file1 file2.
Maybe. But revert is usually much simpler to use, because I don't need
to type `bzr mv new-name old-name`, just `bzr revert`. Simple and beautiful.
> Associate bug in qbzr has been marked fix released in 2009 do we really
> need to have this option?
>
> Bzr is recursive by default.
Yes, it is. That's why some commands have --no-recurse option.
--
All the dude wanted was his rug back