bzr revert needs --no-recurse option

[Alexander Belchenko]

We'd like to have `revert --no-recurse` as `add --no-recurse` for QBzr needs (see Bug #491212 for example).

Another use case: I've renamed/moved directory and changed some files within it. I want to revert directory name changes, but keep changes of files.

[Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox)]

If you want to revert the directory name change but not the files change in it you would do $ bzr mv again. If you have changed files in the top level dir you can just list them $ bzr revert file1 file2.

Associate bug in qbzr has been marked fix released in 2009 do we really need to have this option?

Bzr is recursive by default.

[Alexander Belchenko (bialix)]

Dmitrijs Ledkovs пишет:
> If you want to revert the directory name change but not the files change
> in it you would do $ bzr mv again. If you have changed files in the top
> level dir you can just list them $ bzr revert file1 file2.

Maybe. But revert is usually much simpler to use, because I don't need
to type `bzr mv new-name old-name`, just `bzr revert`. Simple and beautiful.

> Associate bug in qbzr has been marked fix released in 2009 do we really
> need to have this option?
>
> Bzr is recursive by default.

Yes, it is. That's why some commands have --no-recurse option.

--
All the dude wanted was his rug back