On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 09:12 +0000, James Westby wrote:
> That makes sense, but we should have some way to mark that it doesn't
> need a delta either.
Can you expand a bit? Do you mean determining that it doesn't need a
delta so we can avoid running pristine-tar ?
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 09:12 +0000, James Westby wrote:
> That makes sense, but we should have some way to mark that it doesn't
> need a delta either.
Can you expand a bit? Do you mean determining that it doesn't need a
delta so we can avoid running pristine-tar ?
Cheers,
Jelmer