nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance()

Bug #285428 reported by Rwatts
100
This bug affects 18 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Nautilus
Expired
Critical
nautilus (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Medium
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs

Bug Description

Binary package hint: nautilus

nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance()

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
Package: nautilus 1:2.24.0-0ubuntu2
ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined
ProcCmdline: nautilus --no-hostname --browser
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=/home/User Namename/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: nautilus
StacktraceTop:
 g_type_check_instance () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_signal_handlers_disconnect_matched ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance()
Uname: Linux 2.6.27-7-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin netdev plugdev root sambashare scanner tape video

Tags: apport-crash
Revision history for this message
Rwatts (rwatts32) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic stack trace

StacktraceTop:g_type_check_instance () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
g_signal_handlers_disconnect_matched () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
remove_pending (startup_data=0x94421e8, cancel_call_when_ready=0, cancel_timed_wait=1,
is_directory_ready_callback (file=0x92cc640, data=0x94421e8) at fm-properties-window.c:5347
ready_callback_call (directory=0x8966508, callback=0x9440718)

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic threaded stack trace
Changed in nautilus:
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in nautilus:
status: Unknown → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote :

thanks for the report, trace looks like http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=543451, may you tell us a few easy steps in order to reproduce the crash? thanks.

Changed in nautilus:
assignee: nobody → desktop-bugs
status: New → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Popolon (popolon) wrote :

Just crashed on Jaunty 64 bits, with the same error msg, bug report get me here, don't know how to attach new debug informations.

Revision history for this message
Mazen (mezen) wrote :

crash after upgrade from intrepid to jaunty beta and reboot. get the crash message after first jaunty session opening.

Changed in nautilus:
status: Incomplete → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

could anybody try if that's still an issue in jaunty?

Changed in nautilus (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Tomaso Bulligan (tomaso-bulligan) wrote : Re: [Bug 285428] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance()

I filed my bug report from Jaunty. I don't remember what I did for it
to happen so I can't test if it has been fixed lately.

2009/6/10 Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden>:
> could anybody try if that's still an issue in jaunty?
>
> --
> nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance()
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285428
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Nautilus: Invalid
> Status in “nautilus” source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: nautilus
>
> nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance()
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: i386
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
> Package: nautilus 1:2.24.0-0ubuntu2
> ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined
> ProcCmdline: nautilus --no-hostname --browser
> ProcEnviron:
>  PATH=/home/User Namename/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
>  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
>  SHELL=/bin/bash
> Signal: 11
> SourcePackage: nautilus
> StacktraceTop:
>  g_type_check_instance () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
>  g_signal_handlers_disconnect_matched ()
>  ?? ()
>  ?? ()
>  ?? ()
> Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance()
> Uname: Linux 2.6.27-7-generic i686
> UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin netdev plugdev root sambashare scanner tape video
>

Revision history for this message
Martin Mai (mrkanister-deactivatedaccount-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

We still need some steps to reproduce this from someone who got this crash. Thanks.

Revision history for this message
Mathieu Marquer (slasher-fun) wrote :

See duplicate bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/408987 for the steps to reproduce the bug.

Revision history for this message
Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote :

Mathieu with those steps is not reproducible here with Karmic, could somebody add some easy steps to reproduce the issue with latest version on Karmic or Jaunty?

Revision history for this message
Aold (theantoftheweb) wrote :

I couldn't reproduce this bug with nautilus 2.27.4-0ubuntu5 (Karmic) but it still remains with nautilus 2.22.2-0ubuntu4 (Hardy) and nautilus 2.26.2-0ubuntu2 (JAUNTY).
I follow the steps I described here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/408987.

Revision history for this message
Martin Mai (mrkanister-deactivatedaccount-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

Thank you Aold. Since we don't know which code change is responsible for the fix, there is no way to fix this in Hardy or Jaunty. Also we can't take the version from Karmic, because the gap between the two versions is too huge. Therefore I am closing this bug as "fix released".

Changed in nautilus (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Ристе Ристевски (risteristevski) wrote :

I had the same bug on Karmic.

Revision history for this message
hassan121 (k7rata121) wrote :

i had this bug on lucid.

Revision history for this message
Karl Sam (karolus.magnus) wrote :

it happened to me on Maverick. I will try to see if it's reproducible.

Changed in nautilus:
importance: Unknown → Critical
status: Invalid → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.