Please merge anthy 9100e-3.2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Bug #274130 reported by Mitsuya Shibata
2
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
anthy (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: anthy

Please merge anthy 9100-3.2e (main) from Debian unstable (main).
Changelog since current intrepid version 9100e-3.1ubuntu1:

anthy (9100e-3.2) unstable; urgency=low

   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix pending l10n issues
   * Debconf translations:
     - Swedish. Closes: #491756
     - Spanish. Closes: #493297

 -- Christian Perrier <email address hidden> Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:53:53 +0200

Related branches

Changed in anthy:
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Mitsuya Shibata (cosmos-door) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Mitsuya Shibata (cosmos-door) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

I'm not sure it's worth dropping debian/patches/debian/patches/03_change_anthy_dic_path.dpatch - doesn't look like it's applied at all.

Do you think you could change the changelog entry to be a bit more concise? Something like this would be great:

anthy (9100e-3.2ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low

  * Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining Ubuntu changes (LP: #274130)
    - debian/patches/06_fix_vu_dpatch.dpatch: added (LP: #242667).

 -- Mitsuya Shibata <email address hidden> Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:17:56 +0900

Apart from that good work.

Revision history for this message
Mitsuya Shibata (cosmos-door) wrote :

Thank you for advice.

"debian/patches/debian/03_change_anthy_dic_path.dpatch" equals to "debian/03_change_anthy_dic_path.dpatch".
And it included in Debian's anthy package too. I thought that it should be removed to avoid confusion.
Should I remain it? Or should I propose removing patch to Debian Maintainer?

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

I think we should keep it, to not confuse Ubuntu developers looking at the diff between Debian and Ubuntu and also let the Debian maintainer know about it, so they can remove it.

Thanks for working on this. Attach a new debdiff and I'll take a look at it.

Revision history for this message
Mitsuya Shibata (cosmos-door) wrote :

Attached a new debdiff which adopt your suggestion in full.

I understand its reason, and will report it Debian maintainer as soon as
I learn the way to use Debian bug tracking system.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

Check out: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Debian/Bugs (submittodebian is a nice tool).

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

Can you in the debdiff still keep the old Ubuntu changelog entries?

Revision history for this message
Mitsuya Shibata (cosmos-door) wrote :

Sorry for my ignorance... Attached a new debdiff.
And, thank you for letting me know the useful page.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

Thanks a lot for your great work on it. Uploaded - although it'll be sitting in the approval queue for a bit (beta freeze).

Changed in anthy:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package anthy - 9100e-3.2ubuntu1

---------------
anthy (9100e-3.2ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low

  * Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining Ubuntu changes (LP: #274130)
   - debian/patches/06_fix_vu_dpatch.dpatch: added (LP: #242667).

anthy (9100e-3.2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * Fix pending l10n issues
  * Debconf translations:
    - Swedish. Closes: #491756
    - Spanish. Closes: #493297

 -- Mitsuya Shibata <email address hidden> Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:01:34 +0900

Changed in anthy:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.