[focal] pacemaker i386 should drop a few i386 only packages

[Rafael David Tinoco]

When executing pacemaker i386 autopkgtests I realized that package "resource-agents" wasn't available for i386. When discussing this with @vorlon we came into the conclusion that some i386 only cluster packages could be removed from the repository, towards the effort of having *only the essential* packages available in i386 (to be run together with an amd64 host).

IRC log:

"""
<rafaeldtinoco> resource-agents i386 binary package
<vorlon> the pacemaker binary is /not/ present on i386 in the release pocket
<vorlon> that may have been an overly aggressive removal
<rafaeldtinoco> vorlon: are u keeping pacemaker because of dependencies ?
<vorlon> yeah, I removed it when I shouldn't have
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/i386/pacemaker)
<vorlon> rafaeldtinoco: pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of something else we need,
see the referenced germinate output for full details

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends

<vorlon> pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of dlm
<vorlon> and libesmtp-dev is a build-dep of pacemaker, not the other way around
<vorlon> (and dlm is a build-dep of lvm2)
<rafaeldtinoco> ah gotcha
<rafaeldtinoco> dlm -> corosync -> pacemaker
<vorlon> so, even though I removed the binary in error from the release pocket,
the right answer is still for pacemaker/i386 binary to go away (leaving only the
-dev and lib packages)

<vorlon> do you want me to fix that up, or do you want to?
<rafaeldtinoco> to fix that we should do like we did to samba ?
<vorlon> yeah

<vorlon> looks like the binaries you'll need to drop are pacemaker,
pacemaker-cli-utils, pacemaker-remote
<vorlon> and I'll remove those from -proposed right now, so that those don't
hold up migration

<vorlon> but I'll hold off on adding the hint until they're dropped from the
source
<rafaeldtinoco> deal, and next hint ill do with proper branch
"""

[Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco)]

"fakeroot debian/rules build-arch" gives me:

dpkg-deb: building package 'pacemaker-remote' in '../pacemaker-remote_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'pacemaker' in '../pacemaker_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'libcrmcluster29' in '../libcrmcluster29_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'libcrmservice28' in '../libcrmservice28_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'libpe-rules26' in '../libpe-rules26_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'libpengine27' in '../libpengine27_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'libtransitioner25' in '../libtransitioner25_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'libpe-status28' in '../libpe-status28_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'pacemaker-dev' in '../pacemaker-dev_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'libcib27' in '../libcib27_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'liblrmd28' in '../liblrmd28_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'libcrmcommon34' in '../libcrmcommon34_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'libstonithd26' in '../libstonithd26_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'pacemaker-cli-utils' in '../pacemaker-cli-utils_2.0.1-5ubuntu5_i386.deb'.

Since it doesn't build pacemaker-doc it does not depend on missing packages in i386 (pelican, for example).

[Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco)]

Merged and uploaded.

[Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco)]

Upstream already had the following commit (since @vorlon opened the bug in January):

----

commit 543574f18
Author: Ferenc Wágner <email address hidden>
Date: Thu Jan 9 14:19:19 2020

    Omit pacemaker{, -cli-utils, -remote} on Ubuntu/i386

    Closes: #948379

diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 1d186d741..04acd7da2 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -11,8 +11,14 @@ export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND=-Wl,-z,defs
 # Avoid useless dependencies in the utilities
 export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND+=-Wl,--as-needed

+# Ubuntu/i386 shrank into a compatibility layer not carrying the
+# dependencies of some of our binary packages (#948379):
+ifeq ($(shell dpkg-vendor --query vendor)/$(DEB_HOST_ARCH), Ubuntu/i386)
+ UBUNTU_EXCLUDES = -Npacemaker -Npacemaker-cli-utils -Npacemaker-remote
+endif
+
 %:
- dh $@ --with python3
+ dh $@ --with python3 $(UBUNTU_EXCLUDES)

 # autoreconf options taken from autogen.sh
 # without symlink usage (-s) to make --as-needed effective

I'll propose it to include: -Npacemaeker-resource-agents and we will be good.

----

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948379

[Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco)]

https://salsa.debian.org/ha-team/pacemaker/merge_requests/1

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package pacemaker - 2.0.1-5ubuntu5

---------------
pacemaker (2.0.1-5ubuntu5) focal; urgency=medium

  * Fix: Last attempt i386 binary packages removal was wrong (-Nlibkate)
  * Ubuntu i386 binary compatibility only effort: (LP: #1863437)
    - i386 binary package removal:
      - pacemaker
      - pacemaker-cli-utils
      - pacemaker-remote
      - pacemaker-resource-agents

 -- Rafael David Tinoco <email address hidden> Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:52:20 +0000