| 2020-02-15 18:39:28 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2020-02-15 18:39:35 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
pacemaker (Ubuntu): status |
New |
In Progress |
|
| 2020-02-15 18:39:38 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
pacemaker (Ubuntu): importance |
Undecided |
Medium |
|
| 2020-02-15 18:39:40 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
pacemaker (Ubuntu): assignee |
|
Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco) |
|
| 2020-02-15 18:39:48 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Ubuntu Server |
| 2020-02-15 18:39:55 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Ubuntu Server High Availability |
| 2020-02-15 18:40:19 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
description |
When executing pacemaker i386 autopkgtests I realized that package "resource-agents" wasn't available for i386. When discussing this with @vorlon we came into the conclusion that some i386 only cluster packages could be removed from the repository, towards the effort of having *only the essential* packages available in i386 (to be run together with an amd64 host).
<rafaeldtinoco> resource-agents i386 binary package
<vorlon> the pacemaker binary is /not/ present on i386 in the release pocket
<vorlon> that may have been an overly aggressive removal
<rafaeldtinoco> vorlon: are u keeping pacemaker because of dependencies ?
<vorlon> yeah, I removed it when I shouldn't have
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/i386/pacemaker)
<vorlon> rafaeldtinoco: pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of something else we need,
see the referenced germinate output for full details
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends
<vorlon> pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of dlm
<vorlon> and libesmtp-dev is a build-dep of pacemaker, not the other way around
<vorlon> (and dlm is a build-dep of lvm2)
<rafaeldtinoco> ah gotcha
<rafaeldtinoco> dlm -> corosync -> pacemaker
<vorlon> so, even though I removed the binary in error from the release pocket,
the right answer is still for pacemaker/i386 binary to go away (leaving only the
-dev and lib packages)
<vorlon> do you want me to fix that up, or do you want to?
<rafaeldtinoco> to fix that we should do like we did to samba ?
<vorlon> yeah
<vorlon> looks like the binaries you'll need to drop are pacemaker,
pacemaker-cli-utils, pacemaker-remote
<vorlon> and I'll remove those from -proposed right now, so that those don't
hold up migration
<vorlon> but I'll hold off on adding the hint until they're dropped from the
source
<rafaeldtinoco> deal, and next hint ill do with proper branch |
When executing pacemaker i386 autopkgtests I realized that package "resource-agents" wasn't available for i386. When discussing this with @vorlon we came into the conclusion that some i386 only cluster packages could be removed from the repository, towards the effort of having *only the essential* packages available in i386 (to be run together with an amd64 host).
IRC log:
"""
<rafaeldtinoco> resource-agents i386 binary package
<vorlon> the pacemaker binary is /not/ present on i386 in the release pocket
<vorlon> that may have been an overly aggressive removal
<rafaeldtinoco> vorlon: are u keeping pacemaker because of dependencies ?
<vorlon> yeah, I removed it when I shouldn't have
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/i386/pacemaker)
<vorlon> rafaeldtinoco: pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of something else we need,
see the referenced germinate output for full details
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends
<vorlon> pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of dlm
<vorlon> and libesmtp-dev is a build-dep of pacemaker, not the other way around
<vorlon> (and dlm is a build-dep of lvm2)
<rafaeldtinoco> ah gotcha
<rafaeldtinoco> dlm -> corosync -> pacemaker
<vorlon> so, even though I removed the binary in error from the release pocket,
the right answer is still for pacemaker/i386 binary to go away (leaving only the
-dev and lib packages)
<vorlon> do you want me to fix that up, or do you want to?
<rafaeldtinoco> to fix that we should do like we did to samba ?
<vorlon> yeah
<vorlon> looks like the binaries you'll need to drop are pacemaker,
pacemaker-cli-utils, pacemaker-remote
<vorlon> and I'll remove those from -proposed right now, so that those don't
hold up migration
<vorlon> but I'll hold off on adding the hint until they're dropped from the
source
<rafaeldtinoco> deal, and next hint ill do with proper branch
""" |
|
| 2020-02-15 18:40:28 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
nominated for series |
|
Ubuntu Focal |
|
| 2020-02-15 18:40:28 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
bug task added |
|
pacemaker (Ubuntu Focal) |
|
| 2020-02-15 20:09:26 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Steve Langasek |
| 2020-02-15 20:21:05 |
Launchpad Janitor |
merge proposal linked |
|
https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+git/pacemaker/+merge/379254 |
|
| 2020-02-17 13:23:11 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
bug watch added |
|
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948379 |
|
| 2020-02-18 00:21:26 |
Launchpad Janitor |
pacemaker (Ubuntu Focal): status |
In Progress |
Fix Released |
|
| 2020-02-21 01:33:02 |
Launchpad Janitor |
merge proposal linked |
|
https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+git/pacemaker/+merge/379595 |
|
| 2020-02-21 01:33:40 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
merge proposal unlinked |
https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+git/pacemaker/+merge/379595 |
|
|
| 2020-09-25 20:42:11 |
Launchpad Janitor |
merge proposal linked |
|
https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+git/pacemaker/+merge/391397 |
|
| 2020-09-25 20:42:37 |
Rafael David Tinoco |
merge proposal unlinked |
https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+git/pacemaker/+merge/391397 |
|
|
