Comment 6 for bug 1193149

Thanks!

Regarding the sorting: Since the original sorting is saved, there is
actually no need for an additional column - the first click on the header
sorts the folders ascending, the second click descending and the third
shows the original state, read, the order they were originally added.

It's a quite popular theme and is called Numix¹ :)

¹ https://numixproject.org/

2015-01-18 20:43 GMT+01:00 Germar <email address hidden>:

> Okay, now I see. Will have a look on how to implement sorting for this.
> It's not that easy as for include/exclude in Settings.
>
> I think its important to have the all objects sorted in the order they
> were added, too. At the moment I've done this with an extra column which
> is hidden but is the default sort. If you click the header you'll change
> sort to the visible column.
>
> I'll have a look if I can change this without having an ugly list.
>
> BTW nice Theme! Is this Plasma5?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193149
>
> Title:
> Sorting of included and excluded backup folders
>
> Status in Back In Time:
> Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> Would be nice, if the including or excluding backup folders could be
> sorted manually or at least alphabetically in the Back in Time GUI.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/1193149/+subscriptions
>