Comment 43 for bug 1048600

@Laney & Timo: what is the plan for R if shipping with the diff as below? To (a) revert it after release, (b) hoping to ship the metadata-renamed .ttfs in perpetuity.

@Dmitry: for clarity, the change appears to have been made by adjusting the .ttfs rather than source code. (The are arguments both for and against this which I'd like to stay out of)

sfddiff --exact {/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ubuntu-font-family/,}Ubuntu-M.ttf

Names
 The family name differs. In /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ubuntu-font-family/Ubuntu-M.ttf it is (Ubuntu Light) while in /home/sladen/tmp/asdf/latest/Ubuntu-M.ttf it is (Ubuntu Medium)

sfddiff --exact {/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ubuntu-font-family/,}Ubuntu-MI.ttf

Names
 The family name differs. In /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ubuntu-font-family/Ubuntu-MI.ttf it is (Ubuntu Light) while in /home/sladen/tmp/asdf/latest/Ubuntu-MI.ttf it is (Ubuntu Medium)

Even if I'm not back, my offer stands (as per Qt), in that if somebody knowing the LO codebase can debug and find me at the appropriate set of functions/files I can try to offer up a patch.