On Sep 26, 2013, at 2:14 AM, Ghislain Fourny <email address hidden> wrote:
> It is my recollection of the discussion we had that we wanted to not
> throw errors in case of type mismatch, but just consider incompatible
> values different. I am fine either way and being consistent with general
> comparison makes sense, too.
On Sep 26, 2013, at 2:14 AM, Ghislain Fourny <email address hidden> wrote:
> It is my recollection of the discussion we had that we wanted to not
> throw errors in case of type mismatch, but just consider incompatible
> values different. I am fine either way and being consistent with general
> comparison makes sense, too.
Somebody needs to make a decision.
- Paul