Comment 18 for bug 1058398

Revision history for this message
Paul J. Lucas (paul-lucas) wrote : Re: [Bug 1058398] set-based sequence operations

On Sep 26, 2013, at 2:14 AM, Ghislain Fourny <email address hidden> wrote:

> It is my recollection of the discussion we had that we wanted to not
> throw errors in case of type mismatch, but just consider incompatible
> values different. I am fine either way and being consistent with general
> comparison makes sense, too.

Somebody needs to make a decision.

- Paul