On Thursday, September 23, 2010, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Perhaps it would be nice if the user field was unicode. <shrug> The
> definition of this interface predates unicode in Python. This is
> unlikely to change.
>
> A more likely change is to drop these fields altogether and keep just
> the extension data, which allows any picklable data.
What about simply using UTF-8 in zope.app.publication to encode and decode the
principal id. This would require the smallest code change.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"
On Thursday, September 23, 2010, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Perhaps it would be nice if the user field was unicode. <shrug> The
> definition of this interface predates unicode in Python. This is
> unlikely to change.
>
> A more likely change is to drop these fields altogether and keep just
> the extension data, which allows any picklable data.
What about simply using UTF-8 in zope.app. publication to encode and decode the
principal id. This would require the smallest code change.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"