Comment 7 for bug 509801

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Christian Zagrodnick <email address hidden> wrote:
> Any update on this?

No. I don't consider this a burning priority. I'm just glad I added the
assertion. The transaction fails, rather than causing database
inconsistency.

> Can I help somehow?

Obviously, figuring out how to reproduce this would be
wildly helpful. :)

Jim

--
Jim Fulton