There is a problem with the patch, when the "_p_sticky"
is set in the class (rather than the instance).
In our current version, I copy the class attribute into the
instance attribute on instance activation provided the former
exists. But this is still not complete, as the instance might
have been newly added to the ZODB (and then become "active" without
going through an activation).
There is a problem with the patch, when the "_p_sticky"
is set in the class (rather than the instance).
In our current version, I copy the class attribute into the
instance attribute on instance activation provided the former
exists. But this is still not complete, as the instance might
have been newly added to the ZODB (and then become "active" without
going through an activation).