On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:37 PM, ceg <email address hidden> wrote:
> Sorry if I got confused, I only meant to ask if the metadata format
> supports the reordering.
>
> Comment #4 milk2cups :
> > I suggest you add a header there such as: Next: PartX.
>
> Comment #6 Lisa:
> > I would like to work on this. I think milk2cups' idea is good.
>
> That suggested a chain references in the pages, so it should be possible
> to reorder, right? (currently no GUI of course)
>
> Or was natural sorting done differently, and above comment was only
> related to the other reordering issue and just unrelated here?
>
There is a index in the database giving the sorting order. This is not
enough for re-ordering since the index is just cache (it needs to be
possible to rebuild it from the data). So re-ordering probably needs it's
own index.
Please do not discuss further here, but on the ticket related to
re-ordering.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:37 PM, ceg <email address hidden> wrote:
> Sorry if I got confused, I only meant to ask if the metadata format
> supports the reordering.
>
> Comment #4 milk2cups :
> > I suggest you add a header there such as: Next: PartX.
>
> Comment #6 Lisa:
> > I would like to work on this. I think milk2cups' idea is good.
>
> That suggested a chain references in the pages, so it should be possible
> to reorder, right? (currently no GUI of course)
>
> Or was natural sorting done differently, and above comment was only
> related to the other reordering issue and just unrelated here?
>
There is a index in the database giving the sorting order. This is not
enough for re-ordering since the index is just cache (it needs to be
possible to rebuild it from the data). So re-ordering probably needs it's
own index.
Please do not discuss further here, but on the ticket related to
re-ordering.
-- Jaap