Comment 18 for bug 239854
Revision history for this message
| Jaap Karssenberg (jaap.karssenberg) wrote | #18 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
Thinking this over I think I have to revert my previous view point on this. So far little has developed that makes use of treating formatting as a functional markup in zim. So may as well go the way users expect the tool to work and allow some combinations. But need to come up with a bit formal definition of what is allowed.
Would say that headings and verbatim remain functional, so are not allowed to combine with other formats.
Emphasis and strong would be renamed back to bold and italic. Mark remains as-is because I can not convert it to proper underline without breaking existing notebooks.
Strike, mark, bold, Italic, sub- super- script and links should be allowed to combine. Order of precedence (when needed) as listed in the previous sentence.
I would like to put a restriction on links that they can only have a single format for the whole link. This in order to avoid breaking a link when formatting is applied to only part of it.