IMHO our current understanding of LeastRecentActor is wrong...
Let's assume we have sequential events. (The actors are defined by numbers)
2, 1, 3, 2, 1, 4
So we have 4 different actors (1,2,3,4) and we want to sort them by least recent.
the least recent is not 2 or 1 since they are used again at the end. the least recent is 3
This means LeastRecentActors should return the latest actors sorted ASC:
3, 2, 1, 4
and not
2, 1, 3, 4
MostRecentActors should return the same last 4 files but in reversed sorting:
IMHO our current understanding of LeastRecentActor is wrong...
Let's assume we have sequential events. (The actors are defined by numbers)
2, 1, 3, 2, 1, 4
So we have 4 different actors (1,2,3,4) and we want to sort them by least recent.
the least recent is not 2 or 1 since they are used again at the end. the least recent is 3
This means LeastRecentActors should return the latest actors sorted ASC:
3, 2, 1, 4
and not
2, 1, 3, 4
MostRecentActors should return the same last 4 files but in reversed sorting:
4, 3, 1, 2