On 5 January 2011 12:38, Michal Hruby <email address hidden> wrote:
>> file:///home/mikkel/myproject/trunk#27
>
> This is a perfectly valid file (directory) name, with one little problem
> that it doesn't exist.
Fragments should be definition point to some resource inside the
resource specified by the path element. If we consider the path
element as a bzr repo, and not just a file, then I think that a revno
fragment is perfectly reasonable.
On 5 January 2011 12:38, Michal Hruby <email address hidden> wrote: /home/mikkel/ myproject/ trunk#27
>> file://
>
> This is a perfectly valid file (directory) name, with one little problem
> that it doesn't exist.
This is *not* a file name. It is a URI. Let's keep the terminology myproject/ trunk labs.apache. org/webarch/ uri/rfc/ rfc3986. html#components.
correct here. It has path member being /home/mikkel/
and has a URI fragment of 27. Please see
http://
Fragments should be definition point to some resource inside the
resource specified by the path element. If we consider the path
element as a bzr repo, and not just a file, then I think that a revno
fragment is perfectly reasonable.