Comment 14 for bug 1440887

Hi,

I'm finally working on open source scripts to regenerate capillary files from scratch. Hopefully, there will be a commit in a couple of months.
In "Luc Scholtes' capillary files", the d* values were not linearly spaced, as the attached figure shows it (it shows the increment between two successive d* values, and it is not constant)

I see the point not taking an constant increment, but, at the - far ... - time these files were generated, was there a precise reason to take such non linear d* distribution, rather than another (non linear) ?

Thanks,

Jerome

PS : the attached figure applies to d* values as in the capillary files before June 2012, and since April 2015. Between these dates, the "d* structure" was a bit different, with e.g. roughly 27 d* values instead of 50-55