> One option is to replace libopenblas dependency by libatlas (it will also
> eliminate the problems with scipy). The PFV code will be suboptimal and
> non-parallel, but people seeking performance can always recompile with
> openblas.
>
Sure, we can switch to atlas, if you think it will fix (at least partially)
the problem.
> I'm not sure how to best fix yadedaily. I noticed openblas-omp packages
> available for Fedora and others, but not for debian.
>
See [1], it seems there are good reasons not to use Openblas+OpenMP.
[1] https:/ /bugs.debian. org/737675
> One option is to replace libopenblas dependency by libatlas (it will also
> eliminate the problems with scipy). The PFV code will be suboptimal and
> non-parallel, but people seeking performance can always recompile with
> openblas.
>
Sure, we can switch to atlas, if you think it will fix (at least partially)
the problem.
Anton