> You want to start fixing the undo bug you had in mind?
Yes, I do. Hope to be done by the end of month (I also have a job to do).
Will do as you told me, i.e.: will find some cases of "steps to reproduce" and create a bug and assigned myself to it. I believe I may be still in developers groups or smth so there will be no problem with doing so.
BTW my last work was in Windows and I totally forgot about xpad. Now I must use Linux and I was very disappointed and surprised how unusable new stuff (like Ubuntu new Window Manager, don't even know the name, Unity or Gnome3 maybe?) is. I had to learn how to customize Awesome WM and learned to use it instead.
And with it I also started to again use xpad.
IMVHO opinion it proves that despite of the fact that it is written in C in OOP manner (which leads to an over-bloated code) it is still a good S/W: it does one thing and does it right.
> You want to start fixing the undo bug you had in mind?
Yes, I do. Hope to be done by the end of month (I also have a job to do).
Will do as you told me, i.e.: will find some cases of "steps to reproduce" and create a bug and assigned myself to it. I believe I may be still in developers groups or smth so there will be no problem with doing so.
As for search, I trust you will add one as you are assigned to https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/xpad/ +bug/452226/.
BTW my last work was in Windows and I totally forgot about xpad. Now I must use Linux and I was very disappointed and surprised how unusable new stuff (like Ubuntu new Window Manager, don't even know the name, Unity or Gnome3 maybe?) is. I had to learn how to customize Awesome WM and learned to use it instead.
And with it I also started to again use xpad.
IMVHO opinion it proves that despite of the fact that it is written in C in OOP manner (which leads to an over-bloated code) it is still a good S/W: it does one thing and does it right.