Comment 11 for bug 354468

Revision history for this message
Alex Harrington (alexharrington) wrote :

Hi Lindomar

My mistake. I was thinking of a different bug.

If you look at the top of the page, this is still assigned to 1.0.1 in the 1.0 series so we are still hopeful to fix it, subject to it not requiring a major rework as I previously described.

If I remember correctly, Dan already had a quick look and determined that it isn't his code removing those characters, rather a .net library function, so I'm not sure how straightforward this is going to be to resolve.

Cheers

Alex