Comment 1 for bug 618528

The way it currently should work is that if the dates are the same, they are sorted by the order in which they were entered. So if I have $25 in my account, then I spent $50 then deposited $100 (and enter them in that order), it actually was true that my balance was -$25 for a short period of time so it should show that, even if possibly not important to the bank.

If the deposit occurred first and was entered first, which seems logical, then you shouldn't see a negative balance.

Are you finding that the described behavior isn't the case, or do you find that entering transactions in the order in which they occurred is not reasonable and would rather have wxBanker make guesses? I'm just a little worried about hiding information; if it puts positive amounts first for the same date, let's say in the above case I DID actually overdraw my account before depositing, but checking wxBanker and seeing that might make me realize that and give my bank a call to remove any potential fees.