* Was this ntfs-3g patch sent/ack'ed upstream? Is it fixed in Intrepid already?
* What is the rationale for adding the change to ntfs-3g and dropping the equivalent sysctl call in lupin? Is the hack in lupin insufficient to fix the problem? I need to understand why we need to make this "shift" in the hardy stable release (it's certainly good to clean up hacks in Intrepid, of course)
Thanks, Agostino and Colin. Some questions:
* Was this ntfs-3g patch sent/ack'ed upstream? Is it fixed in Intrepid already?
* What is the rationale for adding the change to ntfs-3g and dropping the equivalent sysctl call in lupin? Is the hack in lupin insufficient to fix the problem? I need to understand why we need to make this "shift" in the hardy stable release (it's certainly good to clean up hacks in Intrepid, of course)