Comment 4 for bug 896768

Revision history for this message
Jacky Alciné (jackyalcine) wrote :

This is mainly to get it to working stage.

However, might I add that this might have to be working tightly with SpeechControl? If so, it'd be good to note that bug #918586 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/speechcontrol/+bug/918586) in SpeechControl is the dependent factor of this. We could define direct support for PocketSphinx or just use the functionality of SpeechControl.

Pros: We control development path and know its inner workings.

Cons: We HAVE TO package SpeechControl and allow it to be linked into a plug-in for wintermute (i.e: wntr-spchcntrl).

Thoughts?