Thanks for the patch. So the length of a partition (in sectors) is not necessarily equal to the cylinders * tracks * sectors given in the DISK_GEOMETRY struct. Good to know, I guess.
I wonder if using the "disk size (in bytes)" field of the DISK_GEOMETRY_EX structure would report the same as C*T*S*Bytes (per sector), or the same as the partition info.
At any rate - thanks again for the patch, and I'll get it incorporated for a future release.
Thanks for the patch. So the length of a partition (in sectors) is not necessarily equal to the cylinders * tracks * sectors given in the DISK_GEOMETRY struct. Good to know, I guess.
I wonder if using the "disk size (in bytes)" field of the DISK_GEOMETRY_EX structure would report the same as C*T*S*Bytes (per sector), or the same as the partition info.
At any rate - thanks again for the patch, and I'll get it incorporated for a future release.