Comment 86 for bug 2046844

Revision history for this message
Coeur Noir (coeur-noir) wrote :

Ubuntu 24.04 installed today.

Firefox autonomous archive downloaded from https://www.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/all/#product-desktop-release

And « ooops… » in any tab,

terminal says :

[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6020 exited on signal 11: file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6026 exited on signal 11: file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6036 exited on signal 11: file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6084 exited on signal 11: file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6099 exited on signal 11: file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6110 exited on signal 11: file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6119 exited on signal 11: file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6128 exited on signal 11: file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6143 exited on signal 11: file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6147 exited on signal 11: file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6150 exited on signal 11: file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265

…firefox as a snap looks to run fine but I have many bwrap processes that use 100% cpu to the point of over-heating.
Is it related ?
See picture of monitor → https://i.ibb.co/BZCfNjJ/2404-bwrap.png