Comment 7 for bug 902464

Wow. That was my fuckup. I didnt even catch it when i was looking over the diff of my change again - so subtle. Great catch Joachim! Good to see you back in action.

I merged this, but removed the unneeded temporary variable, it now reads:
 if (m_filled && m_owner.get_economy())
  m_owner.get_economy()->remove_wares(m_ware, m_filled);

I hope I didn't miss something subtle here again :)