Not sharing the same opinion of the theoretic perfect game is one thing. It's ok and there will be a way to find a solution that pleases many (if not all).
It‘s another to assume that someone does not at all have this idea of a good game, but the fainthearted will to cover his losing.
It‘s not about searching excuses for not winning that one thinks about removing a working feature from a game and that one starts a discussion like this.
Not sharing the same opinion of the theoretic perfect game is one thing. It's ok and there will be a way to find a solution that pleases many (if not all).
It‘s another to assume that someone does not at all have this idea of a good game, but the fainthearted will to cover his losing.
It‘s not about searching excuses for not winning that one thinks about removing a working feature from a game and that one starts a discussion like this.