© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
I agree. It would make sense to have a less destructive option than to just burn down a building. (Would be great for empty quarries, fishers huts ...)
As the original post suggest, I think it would be fair that only half of the resources spent constructing the building can be recycled after it has been dismantled. What about time though, should it take equally long time to build something as to tear it down, or should the dismantle process go faster?
Now that the builder worker get two tasks, perhaps a priority button should be added for builders as well, to indicate if the priority is to finish new buildings or dismantle the old ones. (This might be a separate issue, though)