Comment 22 for bug 1204226

Just to add that I tried it and failed... The llvm/clang package on lucid also seems to be out of date and does not like some of the c++11 statements in the code. I can't name them now but I could, if someone is interested. So, using clang as substitute for lucid also does not seem to work (though I would think it would be good if hjd or someone else with a lucid system could check that too, 4 eyes is better than 2).