> Rob and Ulrich, I need your help with this xemacs compilation problem.
> Can you double check that the following fix makes sense? I don't quite
> understand the configure files and I am only guessing.
The patch looks safe to me. XEmacs doesn't have an -L option, and the
additional dir in the load-path is only needed to find vm-build.el.
> Rob and Ulrich, I need your help with this xemacs compilation problem.
> Can you double check that the following fix makes sense? I don't quite
> understand the configure files and I am only guessing.
The patch looks safe to me. XEmacs doesn't have an -L option, and the
additional dir in the load-path is only needed to find vm-build.el.