Comment 1 for bug 747159

I'm just wondering what is occurring related to this report that seems
strange. I certainly agree with the importance of recognizing threads
roots as such but I have not seen any weird behavior with stand alone
threads or anything. Shouldn't the operations naturally just occur
with the root in such a case? And if the original root is deleted the
second in line becomes the root, behavior which is exhibited at
present in VM.

Or maybe I'm reading this wrong, it's a call to be on the lookout for
strange things?

-Arik