> re: "no harm in sending all the headers". Often I don't want to forward
> on all the headers because I don't want to expose internal header
> information. My only recourse now (for encapsulated message/rfc822
> forwarding) is to edit the message before forwarding which is klunky
> (and a [tiny] step backward in vm functionality).
Ok, that is a good argument. I have added new variables for controlling
plain-text forwarding. So, I am reverting the original variables to the old
behaviour.
Changes committed in revision 1199. Please test it out.
John Hein writes:
> re: "no harm in sending all the headers". Often I don't want to forward
> on all the headers because I don't want to expose internal header
> information. My only recourse now (for encapsulated message/rfc822
> forwarding) is to edit the message before forwarding which is klunky
> (and a [tiny] step backward in vm functionality).
Ok, that is a good argument. I have added new variables for controlling
plain-text forwarding. So, I am reverting the original variables to the old
behaviour.
Changes committed in revision 1199. Please test it out.
Cheers,
Uday