Uday Reddy wrote at 20:49 -0000 on Mar 2, 2011: > Hi John, do you know which version of Emacs and VM allowed the > space to drop back to 55 MB?
For my previous report, I was using: vm rev 1099 GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (i386-portbld-freebsd7.3, GTK+ Version 2.18.7) (in -nw mode)
> Do you think the new space leak is a difference coming from Emacs > or VM?
Not sure, but when I used 'emacs -nw big_inbox', then C-x k, C-x C-f big_inbox, it does not seem to leak (repeated a few times).
That is, when I just use emacs to open / close the file, no leak.
But when I use vm as described before to "open & close" the file, the 2 MB leak per iteration happens.
I also tried with vm 8.1.1 and the same emacs. It had leaks, too.
Uday Reddy wrote at 20:49 -0000 on Mar 2, 2011:
> Hi John, do you know which version of Emacs and VM allowed the
> space to drop back to 55 MB?
For my previous report, I was using: freebsd7. 3, GTK+ Version 2.18.7)
vm rev 1099
GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (i386-portbld-
(in -nw mode)
> Do you think the new space leak is a difference coming from Emacs
> or VM?
Not sure, but when I used 'emacs -nw big_inbox', then C-x k, C-x C-f
big_inbox, it does not seem to leak (repeated a few times).
That is, when I just use emacs to open / close the file, no leak.
But when I use vm as described before to "open & close" the file, the
2 MB leak per iteration happens.
I also tried with vm 8.1.1 and the same emacs.
It had leaks, too.