Uday Reddy wrote at 11:05 -0000 on Mar 2, 2011:
> Public bug reported:
>
> After using VM for an hour or so, I have an Emacs session that occupies
> about 100MB, even after killing all buffers. An empty Emacs session
> should only occupy about 10MB. So, space is leaking somewhere.
It would be great to squash this bug. Happy to test patches here.
It's probably worse with large inboxes - I just dropped from 259 MB to
55 MB after vm-quit-no-change (after running for ~12 hours).
On the other hand, killing emacs and restarting, then opening the same
inbox puts me at 240 MB, so most of that is not a leak, just emacs
with a large file open.
Hmmm, with vm rev 1099...
fresh emacs 23.2, M-x vm => 240 MB
M-x vm-quit-no-change, M-x vm => 252 MB
M-x vm-quit-no-change, M-x vm => 254 MB
M-x vm-quit-no-change, M-x vm => 256 MB
Uday Reddy wrote at 11:05 -0000 on Mar 2, 2011:
> Public bug reported:
>
> After using VM for an hour or so, I have an Emacs session that occupies
> about 100MB, even after killing all buffers. An empty Emacs session
> should only occupy about 10MB. So, space is leaking somewhere.
It would be great to squash this bug. Happy to test patches here.
It's probably worse with large inboxes - I just dropped from 259 MB to
55 MB after vm-quit-no-change (after running for ~12 hours).
On the other hand, killing emacs and restarting, then opening the same
inbox puts me at 240 MB, so most of that is not a leak, just emacs
with a large file open.
Hmmm, with vm rev 1099...
fresh emacs 23.2, M-x vm => 240 MB
M-x vm-quit-no-change, M-x vm => 252 MB
M-x vm-quit-no-change, M-x vm => 254 MB
M-x vm-quit-no-change, M-x vm => 256 MB