> Ok, I tracked it down to the following: I used
>
> (setq vm-auto-displayed-mime-content-types '("text/plain"
> "text/enriched"))
>
> so multipart messages were not automatically decoded. When I added
> "multipart" to the list, message yanking worked again, but included
> the button for the zip attachment in the yanked message.
Good that you have found the solution. But this still counts as a bug
in my book because of its unexpected behavior.
- The vm-auto-displayed-mime-content-types problem should have blocked
the multipart message from being displayed properly as well. Was that
the case?
- You say that it works fine in 8.0.9. Does it mean that "mutipart"
didn't need to be included in vm-auto-displayed-mime-content-types in
that version? The NEWS file doesn't say that there has been a change
to this policy either.
- Intuitively, it seems to me that "multipart" types should be handled
automatically and shouldn't be controllable from the
auto-displayed... variable. Do you agree?
Secondly, it seems to me that vm-reply-include-text shouldn't depend
on the auto-displayed... variable either. I will look into this.
Wilhelm Müller writes:
> Ok, I tracked it down to the following: I used displayed- mime-content- types '("text/plain"
>
> (setq vm-auto-
> "text/enriched"))
>
> so multipart messages were not automatically decoded. When I added
> "multipart" to the list, message yanking worked again, but included
> the button for the zip attachment in the yanked message.
Good that you have found the solution. But this still counts as a bug
in my book because of its unexpected behavior.
- The vm-auto- displayed- mime-content- types problem should have blocked
the multipart message from being displayed properly as well. Was that
the case?
- You say that it works fine in 8.0.9. Does it mean that "mutipart" displayed- mime-content- types in
didn't need to be included in vm-auto-
that version? The NEWS file doesn't say that there has been a change
to this policy either.
- Intuitively, it seems to me that "multipart" types should be handled
automatically and shouldn't be controllable from the
auto-displayed... variable. Do you agree?
Secondly, it seems to me that vm-reply- include- text shouldn't depend
on the auto-displayed... variable either. I will look into this.
Cheers,
Uday