VM

Comment 5 for bug 616828

Revision history for this message
Uday Reddy (reddyuday) wrote : [Bug 616828] Re: vm-summary-selected-face acting strange

> Yes, it would mean that existing customization would change, but I'd
> argue this can be justified. The current setup does not allow a user
> to customize the face other than to set it to an already defined
> face. Making it a propper face definition will allow much more
> standard and flexible customization.

But the user can define a new face and set the variable to that face.
So, I don't see a limitation.

The VM documentation makes a big deal of the fact that VM uses face
variables rather than faces themselves. So, there is likely to be
quite a big hooplah if we make a change like this.