> To clarify: I meant that the default should be to ignore the MFT header,
> and we should have an option to enable it. Is "vm-honor-mail-followup-
> to" a good name (there is already "vm-honor-mime-content-disposition")?
Good name!
> Do we need a separate option for "Mail-Reply-To:"?
Ulrich Müller writes:
> To clarify: I meant that the default should be to ignore the MFT header, mail-followup- mime-content- disposition" )?
> and we should have an option to enable it. Is "vm-honor-
> to" a good name (there is already "vm-honor-
Good name!
> Do we need a separate option for "Mail-Reply-To:"?
Yes. I think so.
Cheers,
Uday