(In reply to comment #13) > Well, if that works and the extra paths are not harming anything, I'm fine with > using that patch ... at least for now.
Did you talk to upstream about this problem already? Maybe they have some idea how to cleanly solve it.
> modified version of the patch (- original virtualenv site.py, + my changes to > the original virtualenv setup.py)....
That code looks far more complicated to me than it needs to be, but if it works *shrug*.
Maybe Ignacio can comment?
(In reply to comment #13)
> Well, if that works and the extra paths are not harming anything, I'm fine with
> using that patch ... at least for now.
Did you talk to upstream about this problem already? Maybe they have some idea how to cleanly solve it.
> modified version of the patch (- original virtualenv site.py, + my changes to
> the original virtualenv setup.py)....
That code looks far more complicated to me than it needs to be, but if it works *shrug*.
Maybe Ignacio can comment?