Comment 8 for bug 2007587

There are plans in Juju to treat snap resources for machine operators as it does OCI resources for kubernetes operators - that is, there is a 1:1 mapping between the charm revision and the resource revision. This feels like the most appropriate way to do this from the charm.

The current problem is that there is just a broad disconnect between the snap and charm stores/revisions. It is far better to have the charm/snap pairing and deliver it that way. That's a future juju improvement.

The workaround should work, as Alex referred to in comment #7, but now has the problem that the payload and the charm differ. That's actually probably okay for the time being.