Comment 295 for bug 191889

Revision history for this message
In , Roc-ocallahan (roc-ocallahan) wrote :

(In reply to comment #106)
> Firefox should not force me to start using NM if it does not do what I
> want.

We're not forcing anyone to start using NM. If NM is not running, Firefox behaves exactly as if this feature was disabled.

If someone produces a protocol for communicating network status that's more widely deployed than NM, and doesn't require polling, and doesn't rely on unstable or Linux-only kernel interfaces, we'll use it. Let me know when that happens.