Comment 6 for bug 387216
Revision history for this message
| Scott James Remnant (Canonical) (canonical-scott) wrote Re: 0.3 assert if post-start process ends after main process | #6 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
A similar bug exists in 0.5, bug #381048
This is caused by the respawn handling being done before the check for not transitioning a state. It's very possible that this is just a duplicate, and the bug has existed that long.
I'm not clear as to why you've modified job_next_state() or why you've introduced checks for JOB_WAITING anywhere - could you explain those? To me it looks like the job_child_reaper() change is sufficient - which is the proposed fix for bug #381048