Comment 6 for bug 348455
Revision history for this message
| Scott James Remnant (Canonical) (canonical-scott) wrote Re: [Bug 348455] Re: init: transfer state across re-exec | #6 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 13:35 +0000, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> That is why I have started an Upstart branch (lp:~jajcus-jajcus/upstart
> /state-save) to implement full state saving and re-exec with state
> transfer. I hope this can help making Upstart a usable (in all cases)
> replacement for SysVinit.
>
Awesome!
The biggest mental block I had was getting the state out of libdbus
about the state of connections to Upstart, state of messages, etc.
Restarting Upstart shouldn't drop in-progress commands.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?