On 02/11/2009 01:35 PM, Elliott Hughes wrote:
> On Wed, February 11, 2009 08:48, John Vivirito wrote:
>> You do know that the repo is a debian repo right? that carries debian
>> binaries with it. Ubuntu has never supported unofficial repos since we
>> cant control what is uploaded to them its been like that since before
>> dapper release.
>
> as maintainer of the repository in question, i have a pretty good idea of
> exactly what's in it.
>
you stated that debian repo has nothing to do with this bug, see comment: https://bugs.launchpad.net/update-manager/+bug/77528/comments/9
It has everything to do with it. Since we dont support it we wont try to
allow it in u-m.
If you want to use a repo for Ubuntu why dont you convert the debian
packages to ubuntu packages and use your PPA for Ubuntu packages?
On 02/11/2009 01:35 PM, Elliott Hughes wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/update- manager/ +bug/77528/ comments/ 9
> On Wed, February 11, 2009 08:48, John Vivirito wrote:
>> You do know that the repo is a debian repo right? that carries debian
>> binaries with it. Ubuntu has never supported unofficial repos since we
>> cant control what is uploaded to them its been like that since before
>> dapper release.
>
> as maintainer of the repository in question, i have a pretty good idea of
> exactly what's in it.
>
you stated that debian repo has nothing to do with this bug, see comment:
https:/
It has everything to do with it. Since we dont support it we wont try to
allow it in u-m.
If you want to use a repo for Ubuntu why dont you convert the debian
packages to ubuntu packages and use your PPA for Ubuntu packages?
--
Sincerely Yours,
John Vivirito
https:/ /launchpad. net/~gnomefreak /wiki.ubuntu. com/JohnVivirit o
https:/
Linux User# 414246
"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
-- Metallica from Unforgiven III