2013/3/14 Marco Biscaro <email address hidden>:
> Em 14-03-2013 18:42, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) escreveu:
>> However, the code is well tested and really can't cause any regression
>> (since it adds something wasn't possible to do before).
>
> Of course it adds a new feature, something that wasn't possible to do
> before (that's why it needs a FFE).
What I mean is that is not changing code paths that we're currently
using, thus the possibility of having regressions is small.
2013/3/14 Marco Biscaro <email address hidden>:
> Em 14-03-2013 18:42, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) escreveu:
>> However, the code is well tested and really can't cause any regression
>> (since it adds something wasn't possible to do before).
>
> Of course it adds a new feature, something that wasn't possible to do
> before (that's why it needs a FFE).
What I mean is that is not changing code paths that we're currently
using, thus the possibility of having regressions is small.