Comment 4 for bug 1194867

@Michi: I don't care TBH if licensecheck detects or not the license as long as there is no mix anymore (even if I would prefer to have licensecheck passing for easier detection. Note that our license stenza on the Canonical wiki used to pass licensecheck (and IIRC, the tool was checked in Debian with some lawers) ;)
Did you look as well at the content in tests/ IIRC, there is a mix of LGPL and GPL there as well, but to be reched ;)

@Jussi: most of upstream are following the COPYING for the main license of the package and then COPYING.<licensename> for other licenses used. Using the term ".LIB" doesn't really determine what's in the lib or noto. Just speaking of practical usage and I think it would be good for us to follow them.

Anyway, just do a MP and we can iterate from that. Thanks guys!