Are you saying running qmlviewer and unity-qt-places yields identical performance? I am seeing a big difference on Kunlun imx51 arm board.
On Nov 24, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Florian Boucault <email address hidden> wrote:
> @Bill: after careful investigation I was unable to reproduce the
> performance issue you are describing on the EFIKA board. I am using
> unity-qt-places 0.2~bzr289
>
> --
> [launcher] dash performance poor on ARM
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674484
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of The
> Upicek team, which is a direct subscriber.
Are you saying running qmlviewer and unity-qt-places yields identical performance? I am seeing a big difference on Kunlun imx51 arm board.
On Nov 24, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Florian Boucault <email address hidden> wrote:
> @Bill: after careful investigation I was unable to reproduce the /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 674484
> performance issue you are describing on the EFIKA board. I am using
> unity-qt-places 0.2~bzr289
>
> --
> [launcher] dash performance poor on ARM
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of The
> Upicek team, which is a direct subscriber.